tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2543314570867863460.post4953285990791850583..comments2023-12-02T03:40:12.172-05:00Comments on Google Blogger Closes Gay Blogs: Yahoo/Tumblr NOW CLOSING GAY BLOGS!!!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13538496653308570216noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2543314570867863460.post-29510315673203151062014-12-15T10:31:18.603-05:002014-12-15T10:31:18.603-05:00I don'want to be too talkative, but I add that...I don'want to be too talkative, but I add that they don't warn us when they don't want to hear what we can say. If it's a problem of copyright for instance, they ask if we can prove that we have an authorisation, but in the same time they give us a link to the post that they have already destroyed and which doesn't exist anymore. And they say that if it happens too often we risk to have our blog deleted but they never say how many is too much, even if you ask for it. Anyway, as well this kind of problem or the new crime to have a merchant blog (because there is a link which is no more that what we can have by typing the watermark in the search bar of Google for instance), it does not affect their purse, contrary to a too heavy blog. A reblog is only a link which weighs a pinch of Kb, a photoset of gifs 10 can weighs 20Mb.<br />Blogger, Tumblr or another, it's not a problem of porn or not or of gay or not. Nothing exists for them but their god, the money. Give them a billion dollars and you'll will allowed to shit on their faces, and they will thank you for both.<br />I have is a synchronized backup copy of more than 37,000 of my old posts and of all the new ones, on a blog where the hosting is for free with a limitation. I pay about $60 per year for an unlimited hosting but I have never had a single one problem of all those found by Tumblr. This (= to pay) explaining that (= to have no problem). <br />Best regards, my dear friend.<br />Your French Patrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05351398913189601455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2543314570867863460.post-65892381863825309652014-12-15T10:03:40.660-05:002014-12-15T10:03:40.660-05:00Thanks for all the information about Tumblr/Yahoo ...Thanks for all the information about Tumblr/Yahoo Patrick, I was so hoping things would have gotten better after Yahoo bought Tumblr, but it sounds like it hasn't. Oh well, all we can do is keep trying and hoping for the best. Your Blogger Buddy Always, (Brent)Brenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00167842463649312918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2543314570867863460.post-83999479460140860872014-12-14T20:17:48.777-05:002014-12-14T20:17:48.777-05:00Hi my, friend. My blog "frenchpatrick" h...Hi my, friend. My blog "frenchpatrick" has been murdered by Tumblr when I reached the 40,000 followers. On every point that is as if it had never existed. I restarted on the 28th of October @ http://french-patrick.tumblr.com/<br />Yahoo (Tumblr is dead, now it's Yahoo, and it's VERY different, and not for being better) killed my blog previous "frenchpatrick". No warning, no advice, and a single automatical answer for ten messages from me. More than 10,000 hours of work down the drain. Tumblr said that my blog was a marketing one, while I have never win a cent. LOL, in fact one time in three years a check of $50, but the banks (mine and the bank of the website) fees and the change fees caused a debit upper to the credit. More exactly they said "a mainly marketing blog" while it was only a post out of 24, and I know a lot of blogs where it's 100% which have no problem for many years. It is a dilemma, if we do not put a link towards the owner of the site it is a violation of copyright, if we put one it is of the marketing and they are both forbidden. In your opinion, how much there would be of photos on their 23 million blogs if nobody ever uploaded anything and if everybody made only reblogs? No photo has no author. No author accepts that we publish his photos without putting a link towards his website. Then, only a handful of selfies? Another important point: when Blogger change something in its instructions for use, it sends an e-mail to every webmaster in advance, while Yahoo believe that everybody re-read its nstructions for use every day.<br />I think that the real reason is that my blog had become too big with its 37,000 posts (of which a lot with ten heavy gifs), its 40,000 followers, its most than reblogs 3,000 a day. The hosting is free for us, not for them. They earn money from it by other ways than to make us pay for it, otherwise, for instance, Yahoo would not have bought them for more than a billion. But there is a threshold beyond of which a blog costs to them more that it give their money back to them. That's also why there are so much limitations: no more than 70 upload per day, no more than 5 minutes for a video, no more than 5.000 blogs followed, etc., etc. Then these hypocrites said that I made of the marketing. On the other paw (as says my dog) no, they are not stupid, only bastards in bad faith for whom business is businesst, and they are anything but selfless.<br />Wishing you a LOVE-ly day with my best regards.Your French Patrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05351398913189601455noreply@blogger.com